Good discussion that covered a lot of ground. I took away that none of us have signed on to be early adopters of brain augmentations, but some expect development of body and brain augmentations to continue and accelerate. We also considered the idea of bio-engineered and medical paths to significant life-span, health, and cognitive capacity improvements. I appreciated the ethical and value questions (Why pursue any of this? What would/must one give up to become transhuman? Will the health and lifespan enhancements be equally available to all? What could be the downsides of extremely extended lives?) Also, isn’t there considerable opportunity for smarter transhumans, along with AI tools, to vastly improve the lives of many people by finding ways to mitigate problems we’ve inherited (disease, etc.) and created (pollution, conflict, etc.)?
15 Nov 16 Discussion on Transhumanism
by Mark H | Nov 16, 2016 | artificial intelligence, bioengineering, brain, cognition, cognitive bias, cybernetics, deep learning, evolution, limbic system, machine learning, neural networks, psychology, risk analysis, singularity, superintelligence, transhumanism | 0 comments